You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implementing OECD GLP principles for the evaluation of novel vector control tools: a case study with two novel LLINs, SafeNet® and SafeNet NF®
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-022-04208-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Salum Azizi, Janneke Snetselaar, Robert Kaaya, Johnson Matowo, Hudson Onen, Magreth Shayo, Ezekia Kisengwa, Evod Tilya, Baltazari Manunda, Benson Mawa, Franklin Mosha, Matthew Kirby |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 22% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 15% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 19% |
| Unknown | 9 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2022.
All research outputs
#17,670,096
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#4,828
of 5,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,034
of 439,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#93
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.