You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
PlantPAN: Plant promoter analysis navigator, for identifying combinatorial cis-regulatory elements with distance constraint in plant gene groups
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, November 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-9-561 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wen-Chi Chang, Tzong-Yi Lee, Hsien-Da Huang, His-Yuan Huang, Rong-Long Pan |
| Abstract |
The elucidation of transcriptional regulation in plant genes is important area of research for plant scientists, following the mapping of various plant genomes, such as A. thaliana, O. sativa and Z. mays. A variety of bioinformatic servers or databases of plant promoters have been established, although most have been focused only on annotating transcription factor binding sites in a single gene and have neglected some important regulatory elements (tandem repeats and CpG/CpNpG islands) in promoter regions. Additionally, the combinatorial interaction of transcription factors (TFs) is important in regulating the gene group that is associated with the same expression pattern. Therefore, a tool for detecting the co-regulation of transcription factors in a group of gene promoters is required. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| India | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 250 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 72 | 27% |
| Researcher | 50 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 47 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 14% |
| Unknown | 28 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 170 | 63% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 47 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | <1% |
| Engineering | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 3% |
| Unknown | 37 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,766,521
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#1,528
of 10,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,687
of 165,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#27
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.