You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Is the future of peer review automated?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Research Notes, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13104-022-06080-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert Schulz, Adrian Barnett, René Bernard, Nicholas J. L. Brown, Jennifer A. Byrne, Peter Eckmann, Małgorzata A. Gazda, Halil Kilicoglu, Eric M. Prager, Maia Salholz-Hillel, Gerben ter Riet, Timothy Vines, Colby J. Vorland, Han Zhuang, Anita Bandrowski, Tracey L. Weissgerber |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 11% |
| Australia | 3 | 6% |
| Mexico | 2 | 4% |
| Colombia | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 4% |
| Ukraine | 2 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 18 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 54% |
| Scientists | 17 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 13% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 2 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 11 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 130. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2024.
All research outputs
#327,595
of 25,840,929 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#24
of 4,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,987
of 449,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#1
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,840,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.