You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Algorithm for the resuscitation of traumatic cardiac arrest patients in a physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical service
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc12504 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter Brendon Sherren, Cliff Reid, Karel Habig, Brian J Burns |
| Abstract |
Survival rates following traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA) are known to be poor but resuscitation is not universally futile. There are a number of potentially reversible causes to TCA and a well-defined group of survivors. There are distinct differences in the pathophysiology between medical cardiac arrests and TCA. The authors present some of the key differences and evidence related to resuscitation in TCA, and suggest a separate algorithm for the management of out-of-hospital TCA attended by a highly trained physician and paramedic team. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 129 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 34 | 26% |
| United States | 15 | 12% |
| Australia | 14 | 11% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| South Africa | 3 | 2% |
| Italy | 3 | 2% |
| Denmark | 2 | 2% |
| Norway | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 40 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 73 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 42 | 33% |
| Scientists | 14 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 132 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 27 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 16% |
| Researcher | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 28 | 20% |
| Unknown | 18 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 102 | 73% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 98. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2019.
All research outputs
#429,182
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#248
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,814
of 208,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#3
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.