You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genetic diversity and population structure of Musa accessions in ex situconservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Plant Biology, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2229-13-41 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Onildo Nunes de Jesus, Sebastião de Oliveira e Silva, Edson Perito Amorim, Claudia Fortes Ferreira, José Marcello Salabert de Campos, Gabriela de Gaspari Silva, Antonio Figueira |
| Abstract |
Banana cultivars are mostly derived from hybridization between wild diploid subspecies of Musa acuminata (A genome) and M. balbisiana (B genome), and they exhibit various levels of ploidy and genomic constitution. The Embrapa ex situ Musa collection contains over 220 accessions, of which only a few have been genetically characterized. Knowledge regarding the genetic relationships and diversity between modern cultivars and wild relatives would assist in conservation and breeding strategies. Our objectives were to determine the genomic constitution based on Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) regions polymorphism and the ploidy of all accessions by flow cytometry and to investigate the population structure of the collection using Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) loci as co-dominant markers based on Structure software, not previously performed in Musa. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 25 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 66 | 59% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 26 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2013.
All research outputs
#15,740,505
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#1,195
of 3,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,972
of 208,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#16
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,588 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.