You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Imaging gravity-induced lung water redistribution with automated inline processing at 0.55 T cardiovascular magnetic resonance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-022-00862-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Felicia Seemann, Ahsan Javed, Rachel Chae, Rajiv Ramasawmy, Kendall O’Brien, Scott Baute, Hui Xue, Robert J. Lederman, Adrienne E. Campbell-Washburn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Researcher | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 23% |
| Engineering | 3 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 15% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2022.
All research outputs
#20,954,044
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,197
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#335,476
of 449,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#13
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.