You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Real-World experience of interictal burden and treatment in migraine: a qualitative interview study
The Journal of Headache and Pain, June 2022
Siu Hing Lo, Katy Gallop, Timothy Smith, Lauren Powell, Karissa Johnston, Lena T. Hubig, Emma Williams, Vladimir Coric, Linda Harris, Gilbert L’Italien, Andrew J. Lloyd
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||2||67%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||33%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||1||3%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||2||6%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||2||6%|
|Business, Management and Accounting||1||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2022.
All research outputs
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Headache and Pain
of 1,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 447,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Headache and Pain
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.