↓ Skip to main content

Responding to the deaf in disasters: establishing the need for systematic training for state-level emergency management agencies and community organizations

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
20 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Responding to the deaf in disasters: establishing the need for systematic training for state-level emergency management agencies and community organizations
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-84
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alina Engelman, Susan L Ivey, Winston Tseng, Donna Dahrouge, Jim Brune, Linda Neuhauser

Abstract

Deaf and hard-of-hearing (Deaf/HH) individuals have been underserved before and during emergencies. This paper will assess Deaf/HH related emergency preparedness training needs for state emergency management agencies and deaf-serving community-based organizations (CBOs).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Grenada 1 <1%
Unknown 146 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 19%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Researcher 8 5%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 47 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 27 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 6%
Engineering 7 5%
Other 30 20%
Unknown 50 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2022.
All research outputs
#834,680
of 24,247,965 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#197
of 8,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,826
of 198,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#4
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,247,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.