You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multimodal data analysis reveals that pancreatobiliary-type ampullary adenocarcinoma resembles pancreatic adenocarcinoma and differs from cholangiocarcinoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12967-022-03473-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jun Cheng, Yize Mao, Wenhui Hong, Wanming Hu, Peng Shu, Kun Huang, Jingjing Yu, Maofen Jiang, Liqin Li, Wei Wang, Dong Ni, Shengping Li |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 14% |
| France | 1 | 14% |
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| Germany | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 50% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 13% |
| Librarian | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 3 | 38% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 13% |
| Psychology | 1 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,346,267
of 23,915,168 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1,170
of 4,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,666
of 428,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#17
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,915,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.