You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Intraoperative use of extracorporeal CO2 removal (ECCO2R) and emergency ECMO requirement in patients undergoing lung transplant: a case-matched cohort retrospective study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care, May 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s44158-022-00050-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Franco Ruberto, Francesco Alessandri, Mario Piazzolla, Veronica Zullino, Katia Bruno, Paola Celli, Daniele Diso, Federico Venuta, Federico Bilotta, Francesco Pugliese |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Malaysia | 1 | 25% |
Italy | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2022.
All research outputs
#13,772,104
of 23,730,866 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,047
of 442,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,730,866 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them