You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Race and gender variation in response to evoked inflammation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5876-11-63 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jane F Ferguson, Parth N Patel, Rhia Y Shah, Claire K Mulvey, Ram Gadi, Prabhjot S Nijjar, Haris M Usman, Nehal N Mehta, Rachana Shah, Stephen R Master, Kathleen J Propert, Muredach P Reilly |
| Abstract |
Race- and gender-variation in innate immunity may contribute to demographic differences in inflammatory and cardiometabolic disease; yet their influence on dynamic responses during inflammatory stress is poorly understood. Our objective was to examine race and gender influence on the response to experimental endotoxemia. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 21% |
| Unknown | 11 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 7% |
| Psychology | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 13 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2016.
All research outputs
#20,880,816
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#3,465
of 4,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,551
of 209,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#49
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,692 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.