You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification of the active substances and mechanisms of ginger for the treatment of colon cancer based on network pharmacology and molecular docking
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioData Mining, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13040-020-00232-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Meng-Meng Zhang, Dan Wang, Feng Lu, Rong Zhao, Xun Ye, Lin He, Li Ai, Chun-Jie Wu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 118 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 55 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 16 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 55 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,766,269
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from BioData Mining
#87
of 307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,327
of 499,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioData Mining
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 499,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.