You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Debriefing strategies for interprofessional simulation—a qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Simulation, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41077-022-00214-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Catherine Holmes, Edward Mellanby |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 18 | 24% |
| Canada | 5 | 7% |
| Australia | 4 | 5% |
| United States | 4 | 5% |
| Saudi Arabia | 3 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 32 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 25% |
| Scientists | 11 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 18 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2022.
All research outputs
#711,329
of 24,932,492 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Simulation
#14
of 262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,440
of 434,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Simulation
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,932,492 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.