↓ Skip to main content

Quality assurance of radiotherapy in the ongoing EORTC 22042–26042 trial for atypical and malignant meningioma: results from the dummy runs and prospective individual case Reviews

Overview of attention for article published in Radiation Oncology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quality assurance of radiotherapy in the ongoing EORTC 22042–26042 trial for atypical and malignant meningioma: results from the dummy runs and prospective individual case Reviews
Published in
Radiation Oncology, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1748-717x-8-23
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mehtap Coskun, William Straube, Coen W Hurkmans, Christos Melidis, Patricia F de Haan, Salvador Villà, Sandra Collette, Damien C Weber

Abstract

The ongoing EORTC 22042-26042 trial evaluates the efficacy of high-dose radiotherapy (RT) in atypical/malignant meningioma. The results of the Dummy Run (DR) and prospective Individual Case Review (ICR) were analyzed in this Quality Assurance (QA) study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 50 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 18%
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 12 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Psychology 1 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 15 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2013.
All research outputs
#13,683,716
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#722
of 2,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,059
of 282,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#19
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,046 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.