↓ Skip to main content

Major adverse cardiovascular event definitions used in observational analysis of administrative databases: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
238 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Major adverse cardiovascular event definitions used in observational analysis of administrative databases: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12874-021-01440-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elliott Bosco, Leon Hsueh, Kevin W. McConeghy, Stefan Gravenstein, Elie Saade

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 238 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 9%
Student > Bachelor 16 7%
Student > Master 15 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 13 5%
Other 39 16%
Unknown 120 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 26%
Unspecified 11 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 127 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,277,391
of 24,648,202 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#512
of 2,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,412
of 433,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#16
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,648,202 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.