You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of named entity recognition methodologies in biomedical documents
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12938-018-0573-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hye-Jeong Song, Byeong-Cheol Jo, Chan-Young Park, Jong-Dae Kim, Yu-Seop Kim |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 24% |
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 27 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 42 | 46% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2022.
All research outputs
#4,155,371
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#97
of 821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,027
of 351,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 821 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.