Title |
Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis with an imaging-invisible ovarian teratoma: a case report
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Medical Case Reports, October 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13256-016-1067-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zainab M. Abdul-Rahman, Peter K. Panegyres, Margareta Roeck, David Hawkins, Jude Bharath, Paul Grolman, Cliffe Neppe, David Palmer |
Abstract |
Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis is a recently discovered disease entity of paraneoplastic limbic encephalitis. It largely affects young women and is often associated with an ovarian teratoma. It is a serious yet treatable condition if diagnosed early. Its remedy involves immunotherapy and surgical removal of the teratoma of the ovaries. This case of anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis involves an early surgical intervention with bilateral oophorectomy, despite negative imaging evidence of a teratoma. A 25-year-old white woman with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis presented with behavioral changes and seizures that were confirmed to be secondary to anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis. She required an admission to our intensive care unit for ventilator support and received a number of immunological therapies. Multiple imaging investigations showed no evidence of an ovarian teratoma; she had a bilateral oophorectomy 29 days after admission. Ovarian histology confirmed the presence of a teratoma with neuronal cells. A few days after the operation she began to show signs of improvement and, apart from mild short-term memory loss, she returned to normal function. Our patient is an example of teratoma-associated anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis, in which the teratoma was identified only microscopically. Her case highlights that even with negative imaging evidence of a teratoma, ovarian pathology should still be considered and explored. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 63 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 17% |
Other | 8 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
Other | 10 | 16% |
Unknown | 17 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 34% |
Neuroscience | 7 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Unknown | 20 | 31% |