↓ Skip to main content

Driving pressure-guided ventilation decreases the mechanical power compared to predicted body weight-guided ventilation in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
94 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Driving pressure-guided ventilation decreases the mechanical power compared to predicted body weight-guided ventilation in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Published in
Critical Care, June 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13054-022-04054-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne-Fleur Haudebourg, Samuel Tuffet, François Perier, Keyvan Razazi, Nicolas de Prost, Armand Mekontso Dessap, Guillaume Carteaux

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 14%
Other 5 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 15 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Unknown 16 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2023.
All research outputs
#638,024
of 25,432,721 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#431
of 6,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,135
of 444,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#11
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,432,721 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.