You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Folate deficiency induced H2A ubiquitination to lead to downregulated expression of genes involved in neural tube defects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Epigenetics & Chromatin, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13072-019-0312-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pei Pei, Xiyue cheng, Juan Yu, Jinying Shen, Xue Li, Jianxin Wu, Shan Wang, Ting Zhang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 10% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 21% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 16 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2022.
All research outputs
#4,155,706
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Epigenetics & Chromatin
#170
of 564 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,481
of 358,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epigenetics & Chromatin
#9
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 564 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.