You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Partisan differences in the effects of economic evidence and local data on legislator engagement with dissemination materials about behavioral health: a dissemination trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, June 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13012-022-01214-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jonathan Purtle, Katherine L. Nelson, Luwam Gebrekristos, Félice Lê-Scherban, Sarah E. Gollust |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 46% |
Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 7 | 54% |
Members of the public | 4 | 31% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
Professor | 1 | 3% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 17 | 59% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
Psychology | 2 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 20 | 69% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,059,702
of 25,118,194 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#174
of 1,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,298
of 434,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,118,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.