↓ Skip to main content

The impact of mandatory waiting periods on abortion-related outcomes: a synthesis of legal and health evidence

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
23 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impact of mandatory waiting periods on abortion-related outcomes: a synthesis of legal and health evidence
Published in
BMC Public Health, June 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12889-022-13620-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona de Londras, Amanda Cleeve, Maria I. Rodriguez, Alana Farrell, Magdalena Furgalska, Antonella Lavelanet

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 17%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 13 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Social Sciences 2 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,218,151
of 25,800,372 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,375
of 17,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,884
of 446,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#30
of 446 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,800,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 446 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.