You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
FAF-Drugs2: Free ADME/tox filtering tool to assist drug discovery and chemical biology projects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, September 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-9-396 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Lagorce, Olivier Sperandio, Hervé Galons, Maria A Miteva, Bruno O Villoutreix |
| Abstract |
Drug discovery and chemical biology are exceedingly complex and demanding enterprises. In recent years there are been increasing awareness about the importance of predicting/optimizing the absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity (ADMET) properties of small chemical compounds along the search process rather than at the final stages. Fast methods for evaluating ADMET properties of small molecules often involve applying a set of simple empirical rules (educated guesses) and as such, compound collections' property profiling can be performed in silico. Clearly, these rules cannot assess the full complexity of the human body but can provide valuable information and assist decision-making. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Singapore | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Romania | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 237 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 20% |
| Researcher | 46 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 55 | 21% |
| Unknown | 35 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 62 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 36 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 20 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 13% |
| Unknown | 44 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2013.
All research outputs
#3,508,566
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#1,252
of 7,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,060
of 87,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#5
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.