You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dual-binding nanoparticles improve the killing effect of T cells on solid tumor
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-022-01480-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhenyu Luo, Lihua Luo, Yichao Lu, Chunqi Zhu, Bing Qin, Mengshi Jiang, Xiang Li, Yingying Shi, Junlei Zhang, Yu Liu, Xinyu Shan, Hang Yin, Guannan Guan, Yongzhong Du, Ningtao Cheng, Jian You |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 1 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2022.
All research outputs
#18,353,475
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#888
of 1,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#312,173
of 441,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#75
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,397 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.