↓ Skip to main content

16-membered ring macrolides and erythromycin induce ermB expression by different mechanisms

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Microbiology, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
16-membered ring macrolides and erythromycin induce ermB expression by different mechanisms
Published in
BMC Microbiology, June 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12866-022-02565-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Weizhi He, Kai Jiang, Hua Qiu, Lijun Liao, Shasha Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 50%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2022.
All research outputs
#20,209,145
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#2,676
of 3,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#355,756
of 441,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#46
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,173 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.