You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Unlocking information for coordination of care in Australia: a qualitative study of information continuity in four primary health care models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Primary Care, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2296-14-34 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michelle Banfield, Karen Gardner, Ian McRae, James Gillespie, Robert Wells, Laurann Yen |
| Abstract |
Coordination of care is considered a key component of patient-centered health care systems, but is rarely defined or operationalised in health care policy. Continuity, an aspect of coordination, is the patient's experience of care over time, and is often described in terms of three dimensions: information, relational and management continuity. With the current health policy focus on both the use of information technology and care coordination, this study aimed to 1) explore how information continuity supports coordination and 2) investigate conditions required to support information continuity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 140 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 19% |
| Unknown | 35 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 13% |
| Psychology | 8 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 39 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2013.
All research outputs
#16,047,334
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#1,529
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,536
of 208,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#15
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.