You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prior test experience confounds longitudinal tracking of adolescent cognitive and motor development
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-022-01606-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edith V. Sullivan, Wesley K. Thompson, Ty Brumback, Devin Prouty, Susan F. Tapert, Sandra A. Brown, Michael D. De Bellis, Kate B. Nooner, Fiona C. Baker, Ian M. Colrain, Duncan B. Clark, Bonnie J. Nagel, Kilian M. Pohl, Adolf Pfefferbaum |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 20% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 13% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2022.
All research outputs
#16,231,910
of 24,689,476 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,574
of 2,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,484
of 433,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#36
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,689,476 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.