You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cost-effectiveness of screening tools for identifying depression in early pregnancy: a decision tree model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12913-022-08115-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Margaret Heslin, Huajie Jin, Kylee Trevillion, Xiaoxiao Ling, Selina Nath, Barbara Barrett, Jill Demilew, Elizabeth G. Ryan, Sheila O’Connor, Polly Sands, Jeannette Milgrom, Debra Bick, Nicky Stanley, Myra S. Hunter, Louise M. Howard, Sarah Byford |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 21 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 12% |
| Psychology | 4 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 20 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2022.
All research outputs
#20,237,640
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#7,084
of 7,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#353,273
of 438,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#202
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.