You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A combined strategy involving Sanger and 454 pyrosequencing increases genomic resources to aid in the management of reproduction, disease control and genetic selection in the turbot (Scophthalmus maximus)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-14-180 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laia Ribas, Belén G Pardo, Carlos Fernández, José Antonio Álvarez-Diós, Antonio Gómez-Tato, María Isabel Quiroga, Josep V Planas, Ariadna Sitjà-Bobadilla, Paulino Martínez, Francesc Piferrer |
| Abstract |
Genomic resources for plant and animal species that are under exploitation primarily for human consumption are increasingly important, among other things, for understanding physiological processes and for establishing adequate genetic selection programs. Current available techniques for high-throughput sequencing have been implemented in a number of species, including fish, to obtain a proper description of the transcriptome. The objective of this study was to generate a comprehensive transcriptomic database in turbot, a highly priced farmed fish species in Europe, with potential expansion to other areas of the world, for which there are unsolved production bottlenecks, to understand better reproductive- and immune-related functions. This information is essential to implement marker assisted selection programs useful for the turbot industry. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
| France | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 7% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 51 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 13 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 52% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 9% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2016.
All research outputs
#18,332,122
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#8,152
of 10,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,028
of 196,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#94
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.