↓ Skip to main content

The high-volume haemodiafiltration vs high-flux haemodialysis registry trial (H4RT): a multi-centre, unblinded, randomised, parallel-group, superiority study to compare the effectiveness and cost-effec…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The high-volume haemodiafiltration vs high-flux haemodialysis registry trial (H4RT): a multi-centre, unblinded, randomised, parallel-group, superiority study to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of high-volume haemodiafiltration and high-flux haemodialysis in people with kidney failure on maintenance dialysis using linkage to routine healthcare databases for outcomes
Published in
Trials, June 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13063-022-06357-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fergus J. Caskey, Sunita Procter, Stephanie J. MacNeill, Julia Wade, Jodi Taylor, Leila Rooshenas, Yumeng Liu, Ammar Annaw, Karen Alloway, Andrew Davenport, Albert Power, Ken Farrington, Sandip Mitra, David C. Wheeler, Kristian Law, Helen Lewis-White, Yoav Ben-Shlomo, Will Hollingworth, Jenny Donovan, J. Athene Lane

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Student > Master 2 4%
Researcher 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 30 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 32 60%