↓ Skip to main content

Financial incentives for smoking cessation in pregnancy: protocol for a single arm intervention study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Financial incentives for smoking cessation in pregnancy: protocol for a single arm intervention study
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-13-66
Pubmed ID
Authors

Theresa M Marteau, Josephine Thorne, Paul Aveyard, Julie Hirst, Rachel Sokal

Abstract

Smoking during pregnancy and in the postnatal period is a major cause of low birth weight and a range of adverse infant health outcomes. Stop smoking services can double quit rates, but only 17% of pregnant women smoking at the time they book for antenatal care use these services. In a recent Cochrane review on the effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions in pregnancy, financial incentives were found to be the single most effective intervention. We describe a single arm intervention study offering participation in a financial incentive scheme for smoking cessation to all pregnant smokers receiving antenatal care in one area in England. The aim of the study is to assess the potential effectiveness of using financial incentives to achieve smoking cessation in pregnant women who smoke, to inform the use of financial incentive schemes in routine clinical practice as well as the interpretation of existing trials and the design of future studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Portugal 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Unknown 109 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 20%
Researcher 18 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 21 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Psychology 12 11%
Social Sciences 9 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 23 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2013.
All research outputs
#12,580,762
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2,230
of 4,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,485
of 196,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#46
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.