You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development and validation of a trans-ancestry polygenic risk score for type 2 diabetes in diverse populations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Medicine, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13073-022-01074-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tian Ge, Marguerite R. Irvin, Amit Patki, Vinodh Srinivasasainagendra, Yen-Feng Lin, Hemant K. Tiwari, Nicole D. Armstrong, Barbara Benoit, Chia-Yen Chen, Karmel W. Choi, James J. Cimino, Brittney H. Davis, Ozan Dikilitas, Bethany Etheridge, Yen-Chen Anne Feng, Vivian Gainer, Hailiang Huang, Gail P. Jarvik, Christopher Kachulis, Eimear E. Kenny, Atlas Khan, Krzysztof Kiryluk, Leah Kottyan, Iftikhar J. Kullo, Christoph Lange, Niall Lennon, Aaron Leong, Edyta Malolepsza, Ayme D. Miles, Shawn Murphy, Bahram Namjou, Renuka Narayan, Mark J. O’Connor, Jennifer A. Pacheco, Emma Perez, Laura J. Rasmussen-Torvik, Elisabeth A. Rosenthal, Daniel Schaid, Maria Stamou, Miriam S. Udler, Wei-Qi Wei, Scott T. Weiss, Maggie C. Y. Ng, Jordan W. Smoller, Matthew S. Lebo, James B. Meigs, Nita A. Limdi, Elizabeth W. Karlson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 57% |
| Scientists | 8 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 19 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,458,017
of 25,808,886 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#547
of 1,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,744
of 443,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#20
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,808,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.