↓ Skip to main content

Diamond particles in toothpastes: in-vitro effect on the abrasive enamel wear

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Oral Health, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diamond particles in toothpastes: in-vitro effect on the abrasive enamel wear
Published in
BMC Oral Health, June 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12903-022-02274-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Blend Hamza, Aralia Abdulahad, Thomas Attin, Florian J. Wegehaupt

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Unknown 5 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 33%
Unspecified 1 11%
Unknown 5 56%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2022.
All research outputs
#21,264,673
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Oral Health
#1,242
of 1,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#359,265
of 445,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Oral Health
#37
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,567 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.