↓ Skip to main content

Follicular fluid biomarkers for human in vitro fertilization outcome: Proof of principle

Overview of attention for article published in Proteome Science, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 210)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Follicular fluid biomarkers for human in vitro fertilization outcome: Proof of principle
Published in
Proteome Science, November 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12953-016-0106-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fang Chen, Carl Spiessens, Thomas D’Hooghe, Karen Peeraer, Sebastien Carpentier

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 45 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 15 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 13%
Unspecified 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 16 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,685,999
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Proteome Science
#45
of 210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,556
of 314,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proteome Science
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 210 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.