You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Author Correction: Susceptibility to hormone-mediated cancer is reflected by different tick rates of the epithelial and general epigenetic clock
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-022-02704-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. James E. Barrett, Chiara Herzog, Yoo-Na Kim, Thomas E. Bartlett, Allison Jones, Iona Evans, David Cibula, Michal Zikan, Line Bjørge, Nadia Harbeck, Nicoletta Colombo, Sacha J. Howell, Angelique Flöter Rådestad, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson, Martin Widschwendter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2022.
All research outputs
#20,673,680
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#4,271
of 4,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#329,466
of 441,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#57
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.