↓ Skip to main content

Use of high flow nasal cannula in patients with acute respiratory failure in general wards under intensivists supervision: a single center observational study

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of high flow nasal cannula in patients with acute respiratory failure in general wards under intensivists supervision: a single center observational study
Published in
Respiratory Research, June 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12931-022-02090-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sebastiano Maria Colombo, Vittorio Scaravilli, Andrea Cortegiani, Nadia Corcione, Amedeo Guzzardella, Luca Baldini, Elisa Cassinotti, Ciro Canetta, Stefano Carugo, Cinzia Hu, Anna Ludovica Fracanzani, Ludovico Furlan, Maria Chiara Paleari, Alessandro Galazzi, Paola Tagliabue, Flora Peyvandi, Francesco Blasi, Giacomo Grasselli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 13%
Other 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 10 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Unknown 14 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2022.
All research outputs
#6,426,730
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#769
of 3,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,168
of 443,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#20
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.