You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Dengue and COVID-19: two sides of the same coin
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Biomedical Science, July 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12929-022-00833-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gathsaurie Neelika Malavige, Chandima Jeewandara, Graham S. Ogg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 10 | 14% |
Sri Lanka | 7 | 10% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
Canada | 2 | 3% |
France | 1 | 1% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Belgium | 1 | 1% |
Singapore | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 43 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 59 | 84% |
Scientists | 5 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 6% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 14% |
Researcher | 7 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 5% |
Student > Master | 4 | 4% |
Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 12% |
Unknown | 48 | 52% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 20% |
Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
Other | 10 | 11% |
Unknown | 51 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#992,197
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Science
#35
of 1,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,985
of 441,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Science
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.