↓ Skip to main content

Historical review: the German Neurological Society and its honorary members (1952–1982)

Overview of attention for article published in Neurological Research and Practice, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Historical review: the German Neurological Society and its honorary members (1952–1982)
Published in
Neurological Research and Practice, July 2022
DOI 10.1186/s42466-022-00190-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Martin, Heiner Fangerau, Axel Karenberg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2022.
All research outputs
#12,806,398
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Neurological Research and Practice
#66
of 184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,874
of 434,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurological Research and Practice
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 184 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.