↓ Skip to main content

Real-time ultrasound-guided versus anatomic landmark-based thoracic epidural placement: a prospective, randomized, superiority trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Anesthesiology, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Real-time ultrasound-guided versus anatomic landmark-based thoracic epidural placement: a prospective, randomized, superiority trial
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology, June 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12871-022-01730-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jatuporn Pakpirom, Kanthida Thatsanapornsathit, Nalinee Kovitwanawong, Suttasinee Petsakul, Pannawit Benjhawaleemas, Kwanruthai Narunart, Somrutai Boonchuduang, Manoj Kumar Karmakar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Other 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 8 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 45%
Unspecified 1 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 9 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2022.
All research outputs
#18,397,742
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#990
of 1,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#307,834
of 439,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#49
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,497 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.