↓ Skip to main content

Technical and scale efficiency of public community hospitals in Eritrea: an exploratory study

Overview of attention for article published in Health Economics Review, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Technical and scale efficiency of public community hospitals in Eritrea: an exploratory study
Published in
Health Economics Review, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/2191-1991-3-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joses M Kirigia, Eyob Z Asbu

Abstract

Eritrean gross national income of Int$610 per capita is lower than the average for Africa (Int$1620) and considerably lower than the global average (Int$6977). It is therefore imperative that the country's resources, including those specifically allocated to the health sector, are put to optimal use. The objectives of this study were (a) to estimate the relative technical and scale efficiency of public secondary level community hospitals in Eritrea, based on data generated in 2007, (b) to estimate the magnitudes of output increases and/or input reductions that would have been required to make relatively inefficient hospitals more efficient, and (c) to estimate using Tobit regression analysis the impact of institutional and contextual/environmental variables on hospital inefficiencies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 153 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 24%
Researcher 20 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 5%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 33 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 32 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 19 12%
Social Sciences 14 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 39 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2023.
All research outputs
#6,794,657
of 23,924,386 outputs
Outputs from Health Economics Review
#113
of 460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,331
of 199,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Economics Review
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,924,386 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 460 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.