You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Development and validation of a multivariable prediction model of central venous catheter-tip colonization in a cohort of five randomized trials
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, July 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-022-04078-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jeanne Iachkine, Niccolò Buetti, Harm-Jan de Grooth, Anaïs R. Briant, Olivier Mimoz, Bruno Mégarbane, Jean-Paul Mira, Stéphane Ruckly, Bertrand Souweine, Damien du Cheyron, Leonard A. Mermel, Jean-François Timsit, Jean-Jacques Parienti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Malaysia | 1 | 9% |
Colombia | 1 | 9% |
Mexico | 1 | 9% |
United States | 1 | 9% |
Spain | 1 | 9% |
France | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 27% |
Scientists | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 7 | 29% |
Researcher | 4 | 17% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 7 | 29% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 21% |
Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2022.
All research outputs
#6,339,704
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,631
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,981
of 437,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#75
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.