You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of cone bioassay estimates at two laboratories with different Anopheles mosquitoes for quality assurance of pyrethroid insecticide-treated nets
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-022-04217-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephen G. Mbwambo, Nakei Bubun, Emmanuel Mbuba, Jason Moore, Kasiani Mbina, Dismas Kamande, Moses Laman, Emmanuel Mpolya, Olukayode G. Odufuwa, Tim Freeman, Stephan Karl, Sarah J. Moore |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ghana | 1 | 9% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Scientists | 3 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 17% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 9% |
| Engineering | 2 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 11 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2022.
All research outputs
#4,954,894
of 24,046,191 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,271
of 5,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,399
of 423,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#32
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,046,191 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,772 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.