You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gasdermin-D activation by SARS-CoV-2 triggers NET and mediate COVID-19 immunopathology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-022-04062-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Camila Meirelles S. Silva, Carlos Wagner S. Wanderley, Flavio Protasio Veras, Augusto Velozo Gonçalves, Mikhael Haruo Fernandes Lima, Juliana Escher Toller-Kawahisa, Giovanni Freitas Gomes, Daniele Carvalho Nascimento, Valter V. Silva Monteiro, Isadora Marques Paiva, Cícero José Luíz Ramos Almeida, Diego Brito Caetité, Juliana Costa Silva, Maria Isabel Fernandes Lopes, Letícia Pastorelli Bonjorno, Marcela Cavichioli Giannini, Natalia Brasil Amaral, Maíra Nilson Benatti, Rodrigo Carvalho Santana, Luis Eduardo Alves Damasceno, Bruna Manuella Souza Silva, Ayda Henriques Schneider, Icaro Maia Santos Castro, Juan Carlo Santos Silva, Amanda Pereira Vasconcelos, Tiago Tomazini Gonçalves, Sabrina Setembre Batah, Tamara Silva Rodrigues, Victor Ferreira Costa, Marjorie Cornejo Pontelli, Ronaldo B. Martins, Timna Varela Martins, Danillo Lucas Alves Espósito, Guilherme Cesar Martelossi Cebinelli, Benedito Antônio Lopes da Fonseca, Luiz Osório Silveira Leiria, Larissa Dias Cunha, Eurico Arruda, Helder I. Nakaia, Alexandre Todorovic Fabro, Rene D. R. Oliveira, Dario S. Zamboni, Paulo Louzada-Junior, Thiago Mattar Cunha, José Carlos Farias Alves-Filho, Fernando Queiroz Cunha |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 19 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 21 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,544,090
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,398
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,547
of 437,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#87
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.