↓ Skip to main content

Failure to thrive as presentation in a patient with 22q11.2 microdeletion

Overview of attention for article published in Italian Journal of Pediatrics, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Failure to thrive as presentation in a patient with 22q11.2 microdeletion
Published in
Italian Journal of Pediatrics, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13052-016-0224-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Grazia Bossi, Chiara Gertosio, Cristina Meazza, Giovanni Farello, Mauro Bozzola

Abstract

Abnormalities of chromosome 22q11, including deletions and translocations, have been described in association with different birth defects and malformations occurring in many combinations and degrees of severity. We describe the case of an 8 month-old infant with no dysmorphic signs who showed progressive postnatal growth failure and no chronic systemic diseases. We found a 22q11.2 microdeletion, inherited from the mother, suggesting the diagnosis of DiGeorge syndrome. The patient had an isolated growth hormone (GH) deficiency and a significant increase in linear growth during the first and the second year of GH therapy, and a recovery of weight was shown. Sometimes, in infants with growth failure a genetic analysis is strongly suggested, since chromosomal abnormalities may be present.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 19%
Researcher 4 19%
Student > Postgraduate 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 5 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Linguistics 1 5%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2016.
All research outputs
#19,944,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Italian Journal of Pediatrics
#697
of 1,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,474
of 409,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Italian Journal of Pediatrics
#10
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,059 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.