↓ Skip to main content

Intestinal microbiota, probiotics and mental health: from Metchnikoff to modern advances: Part II – contemporary contextual research

Overview of attention for article published in Gut Pathogens, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 611)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
32 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
5 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
515 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intestinal microbiota, probiotics and mental health: from Metchnikoff to modern advances: Part II – contemporary contextual research
Published in
Gut Pathogens, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1757-4749-5-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alison C Bested, Alan C Logan, Eva M Selhub

Abstract

In recent years there has been a renewed interest concerning the ways in which the gastrointestinal tract - its functional integrity and microbial residents - might influence human mood (e.g. depression) and behavioral disorders. Once a hotbed of scientific interest in the early 20th century, this area lay dormant for decades, in part due to its association with the controversial term 'autointoxication'. Here we review contemporary findings related to intestinal permeability, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, lipopolysaccharide endotoxin (LPS) exposure, D-lactic acid, propionic acid, and discuss their relevance to microbiota and mental health. In addition, we include the context of modern dietary habits as they relate to depression, anxiety and their potential interaction with intestinal microbiota.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 515 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Australia 4 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 499 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 108 21%
Student > Master 84 16%
Researcher 69 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 13%
Other 39 8%
Other 86 17%
Unknown 64 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 130 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 102 20%
Psychology 43 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 4%
Other 93 18%
Unknown 89 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 116. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2023.
All research outputs
#368,402
of 25,711,194 outputs
Outputs from Gut Pathogens
#6
of 611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,372
of 210,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gut Pathogens
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them