↓ Skip to main content

Comparative genomics of parasitic silkworm microsporidia reveal an association between genome expansion and host adaptation

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative genomics of parasitic silkworm microsporidia reveal an association between genome expansion and host adaptation
Published in
BMC Genomics, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-14-186
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guoqing Pan, Jinshan Xu, Tian Li, Qingyou Xia, Shao-Lun Liu, Guojie Zhang, Songgang Li, Chunfeng Li, Handeng Liu, Liu Yang, Tie Liu, Xi Zhang, Zhengli Wu, Wei Fan, Xiaoqun Dang, Heng Xiang, Meilin Tao, Yanhong Li, Junhua Hu, Zhi Li, Lipeng Lin, Jie Luo, Lina Geng, LinLing Wang, Mengxian Long, Yongji Wan, Ningjia He, Ze Zhang, Cheng Lu, Patrick J Keeling, Jun Wang, Zhonghuai Xiang, Zeyang Zhou

Abstract

Microsporidian Nosema bombycis has received much attention because the pébrine disease of domesticated silkworms results in great economic losses in the silkworm industry. So far, no effective treatment could be found for pébrine. Compared to other known Nosema parasites, N. bombycis can unusually parasitize a broad range of hosts. To gain some insights into the underlying genetic mechanism of pathological ability and host range expansion in this parasite, a comparative genomic approach is conducted. The genome of two Nosema parasites, N. bombycis and N. antheraeae (an obligatory parasite to undomesticated silkworms Antheraea pernyi), were sequenced and compared with their distantly related species, N. ceranae (an obligatory parasite to honey bees).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Austria 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 109 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 24%
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 15 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Engineering 2 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 18 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2021.
All research outputs
#4,675,900
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#1,995
of 10,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,306
of 196,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#23
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.