↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of localisation to auditory stimulation in post-comatose states: use the patient’s own name

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neurology, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of localisation to auditory stimulation in post-comatose states: use the patient’s own name
Published in
BMC Neurology, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2377-13-27
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lijuan Cheng, Olivia Gosseries, Limei Ying, Xiaohua Hu, Dan Yu, Hongxing Gao, Minhui He, Caroline Schnakers, Steven Laureys, Haibo Di

Abstract

At present, there is no consensus on how to clinically assess localisation to sound in patients recovering from coma. We here studied auditory localisation using the patient's own name as compared to a meaningless sound (i.e., ringing bell).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 17%
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 15%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 22 27%
Psychology 12 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 18 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2013.
All research outputs
#19,292,491
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#1,957
of 2,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,264
of 218,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#26
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 218,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.