↓ Skip to main content

Nonspecific periaqueductal gray lesions on T2WI in episodic migraine

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Headache and Pain, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nonspecific periaqueductal gray lesions on T2WI in episodic migraine
Published in
The Journal of Headache and Pain, October 2016
DOI 10.1186/s10194-016-0695-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhiye Chen, Xiaoyan Chen, Mengqi Liu, Shuangfeng Liu, Lin Ma, Shengyuan Yu

Abstract

The specific periaqueductal gray (PAG) lesions with migraine-like headache were easily identified on conventional MR images in clinical practice, and the aim of this study is to investigate the nonspecific periaqueductal gray (PAG) lesions in episodic migraine (EM) patients based on T2 weighted imaging (T2WI). T2WI images were obtained from 18 EM patients and 18 normal controls (NC) on 3.0 T MR system. The images were observed by two experienced radiologists, and the lesions were identified on T2WI by consensus by 2 experienced neuroradiologists blinded to the patient identity. Chi-Square test was performed for the significance test. Ring-like hyperintensity lesions (HILs) around the PAG region were observed in 14 EM patients and in 5 NCs on T2WI. Four EM patients and 13 NCs were normal in PAG region. The significance was revealed by Chi-Square test (P = 0.003). HIL of PAG may be the direct evidence of the EM genesis, and the further structural and functional study should be performed to elucidate the neuromechanism of migraine pathogenesis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 20%
Student > Master 4 16%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 5 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 36%
Neuroscience 5 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 32%