↓ Skip to main content

Brief oral health promotion intervention among parents of young children to reduce early childhood dental decay

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
556 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Brief oral health promotion intervention among parents of young children to reduce early childhood dental decay
Published in
BMC Public Health, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-245
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Arrow, Joseph Raheb, Margaret Miller

Abstract

Severe untreated dental decay affects a child's growth, body weight, quality of life as well as cognitive development, and the effects extend beyond the child to the family, the community and the health care system. Early health behavioural factors, including dietary practices and eating patterns, can play a major role in the initiation and development of oral diseases, particularly dental caries. The parent/caregiver, usually the mother, has a critical role in the adoption of protective health care behaviours and parental feeding practices strongly influence children's eating behaviours. This study will test if an early oral health promotion intervention through the use of brief motivational interviewing (MI) and anticipatory guidance (AG) approaches can reduce the incidence of early childhood dental decay and obesity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 556 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
El Salvador 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 547 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 105 19%
Student > Bachelor 64 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 10%
Researcher 37 7%
Student > Postgraduate 36 6%
Other 109 20%
Unknown 151 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 206 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 55 10%
Psychology 39 7%
Social Sciences 36 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 2%
Other 46 8%
Unknown 161 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2013.
All research outputs
#5,513,995
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,427
of 14,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,695
of 197,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#87
of 309 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,776 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 309 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.