You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Assessing availability of scientific journals, databases, and health library services in Canadian health ministries: a cross-sectional study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-8-34 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Grégory Léon, Mathieu Ouimet, John N Lavis, Jeremy Grimshaw, Marie-Pierre Gagnon |
Abstract |
Evidence-informed health policymaking logically depends on timely access to research evidence. To our knowledge, despite the substantial political and societal pressure to enhance the use of the best available research evidence in public health policy and program decision making, there is no study addressing availability of peer-reviewed research in Canadian health ministries. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 12 | 39% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
United States | 2 | 6% |
Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
India | 1 | 3% |
Senegal | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 11 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 48% |
Scientists | 6 | 19% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 16% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chile | 3 | 3% |
Canada | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 86 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Librarian | 18 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 14% |
Researcher | 11 | 12% |
Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
Other | 16 | 18% |
Unknown | 20 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 25% |
Social Sciences | 18 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 10% |
Computer Science | 7 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 12% |
Unknown | 19 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2017.
All research outputs
#1,797,177
of 24,180,797 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#362
of 1,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,527
of 200,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#7
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,180,797 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,754 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.