You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Standardization of a screening instrument (PHQ-15) for somatization syndromes in the general population
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-244x-13-91 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rüya-Daniela Kocalevent, Andreas Hinz, Elmar Brähler |
Abstract |
The PHQ-15 is widely used as an open access screening instrument for somatization syndromes in different health care settings, thus far, normative data from the general population are not available. The objectives of the study were to generate normative data and to further investigate the construct validity of the PHQ-15 in the general population. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Germany | 2 | <1% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 267 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 14% |
Student > Master | 31 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 28 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 9% |
Researcher | 23 | 8% |
Other | 53 | 19% |
Unknown | 74 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 83 | 31% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 23% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 4% |
Neuroscience | 8 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
Other | 14 | 5% |
Unknown | 91 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,965,148
of 24,707,218 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#1,137
of 5,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,805
of 201,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#24
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,707,218 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.